Brad Jesness has added an update
Nov 28,2018
How do you "handle" that which is "abstract"? (Are you an empiricist?)
How you view and approach understanding (and, preferably, discovering) that which is abstract often clearly shows whether you are really an empiricist (or, for that matter, a scientist) OR NOT: See: my Comment to The Challenge of Abstract Concepts for more. DO not forget the last Update: "Essentially, all Recent Essays on Ethogram Theory" : Its Abstract: ALL major essays other than the major foundational papers, "A Human Ethogram .... " and "Information-Processing Theory and Perspectives ...", _INCLUDING_ THE COLLECTED ESSAYS, BUT THEN ALSO INCLUDING _ABOUT 200 PAGES OF ADDITIONAL ESSAYS_. Thus, One might call this "Essentially, all Recent Essays on Ethogram Theory" [ READ online OR DOWNLOAD THE PDF VERSION. ] NOTE: There were 2 sets of some of the same content. One set of the repeated contents was deleted. ( There may be a few more scattered repeats, but hopefully that is justified by additional, different replies found below them. ) I am sorry if there are any needless repeats; putting this collection together in parts over and over (as I periodically collected more additional essays from ResearchGate) was difficult. But, the good news is that this document may, in its unique content, be only 511 pages long (thought the last 27 pages are single-spaced and in small print, making them effectively longer than they look). A major feature of this collection, rather than just viewing my Questions via Researchgate, is that my Replies (and replies to replies) associated with each Question are coped and put next to (under) their respective Questions -- a task that one would have trouble duplicating; also various shorter papers are all collected and put in this document. (A MAJOR file is attached to this previous UPDATE.)